On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 2:30 PM Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 2:53 PM Gerald B. Cox <gbcox@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Why would we be installing something by default that has widely known broken functionality?
Because the default configuration we're using isn't broken and is
better than the alternatives being evaluated.
That raises the question of why RHEL deprecated BTRFS and why Fedora now apparently believes that BTRFS is better than XFS?
> I would think it would be more appropriate to have people who specifically want to use BTRFS functionality and are aware and knowledgeable of the risks to seek it out rather than have it be some sort of selective default. The target audience you're aiming at by making it the default doesn't know FAT from NTFS from EXT4 from XFS from BTRFS or do they care. Neither are they aware or even care about purported benefits.
And they're going to get into trouble with raid56 how? Are you going
to tell them they should convert to raid56? How is it even relevant?
That's not what I said ... in fact, no where in the paragraph did I mention raid56. Re-read what I wrote.
Literally none of this is correct.
Then BTRFS needs to clarify/correct their documentation.
>> > Why are we not concentrating on Stratis and XFS?
>>
...
>
> Ok, then why aren't we working on that?
I don't know. Why aren't you working on that? By all means put
together a competing proposal.
I'm working on what I'm working on.
<Sigh> That's an obvious dodge, Chris. Stratis and XFS are Redhat projects. Many times Fedora demos technologies for RHEL.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
