Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make btrfs the default file system for desktop variants

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le vendredi 26 juin 2020 à 23:28 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko a écrit :
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 23:21, Alex Thomas <karlthane@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Once question, are we looking at using a layout like openSUSE is
> > doing? ( https://en.opensuse.org/SDB:BTRFS ) utilizing subvolumes,
> > or
> > are we looking at something like
> > 
> > /boot/efi > EFI (FAT32)
> > / > btrfs
> > 
> 
> BTW that layout.
> Anaconda still does not allow installing something like that because
> it does not allow /boot on btrfs (technically there is no any
> reasons to demand that and /boot can be just subvolume on the root
> btrfs pool).

Anaconda will detect you’re reusing an efi partition, and complain it
does not fit its requirements of the day, and force you to recreate it
from scratch, blowing up the EFI parts installed by other systems for
their own boot in the process.

Thus, Anaconda EFI support is terrible period.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux