On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 6:37 PM Alex Thomas <karlthane@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 5:25 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 6:11 PM Alex Thomas <karlthane@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Once question, are we looking at using a layout like openSUSE is > > > doing? ( https://en.opensuse.org/SDB:BTRFS ) utilizing subvolumes, or > > > are we looking at something like > > > > > > /boot/efi > EFI (FAT32) > > > / > btrfs > > > > > > > We are planning on using Fedora's current default layout, which has a > > subvolume for / and a subvolume for /home. > > > > Ok, I thought I saw a proposal by you to change the default btrfs > layout to something like openSUSE's using subvolumes, but now, of > course, I cannot find it. I have, at various points in the past couple of years, considered different subvolume configurations. Right now, I'm keeping it simple to our currently tested configuration: /boot on ext4, / and /home as btrfs subvolumes on a single btrfs volume. The only modification I may consider would be moving /boot to be btrfs volume or subvolume, but that's contingent on some discussion with the installer and bootloader teams. However, the existing configuration works *very* well right now. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
