Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Packaging firmwares

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 4:36 PM Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a review request for a firmware: Boot firmware (ATF, UEFI...) for
> Mellanox BlueField:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846139
>
> I would like some opinions on whether this is acceptable firmware. The binary
> contains open source code for which the license are documented, but no code
> source is provided, only the resulting binary firmware.

Assuming these are all the applicable licenses:
https://github.com/Mellanox/bootimages/tree/master/licenses (I looked
at the review request very quickly) these standard FOSS licenses are
all acceptable licenses for Fedora firmware.

Richard
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux