Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 25.06.20 um 14:55 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
> Here is an updated list:
> 
> @certbot-sig
> 
> Please do try to fix this soon!

I'd love to but unfortunately I'm only a user for the certbot sig and even
though I think I'm probably the de-facto maintainer of the certbot stack now I
was not really successful in getting responses from other sig members (trying
for ~6 months now). Also I only learned about the sig mailing lists via this
thread here (but I'm not subscribed there and I don't know how to fix that).

Is there a "non-functional sig" process?

Felix
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux