On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 10:35, Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:22:38AM +0200, clime wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 09:40, Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:51:36AM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > Yes. Putting the "stream identification" into the package name is the > > > > most natural solution, and has been floated various times. > > > > > > This already happens. But not in Fedora. In RHEL, modular packages have > > > Modularitylabel RPM tag that carries the module name and stream. > > > > Does "ModularityLabel" actually propagates to rpm package name or is > > it just a "hidden" rpm attribute? > > > It's a RPM tag as well as a package name or a package version are the RPM > tags. I don't understand your question. Well, the original sentence was: "Putting the "stream identification" into the package *name* is the most natural solution". And the answer was: "This already happens. But not in Fedora. In RHEL, ..." But my question was answered, thank you. > > -- Petr > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
