On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 8:45 AM Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Modularity has been an interesting idea on paper, but not worth the effort. It should not be used for RHEL 9. > It is always good to push the boundaries and search for better ideas > and improvements, and that is part of what makes Fedora great. We are > doing this in the context of the RHEL 9 release as well, so our near > term timeline and requirements mean we are working on evolving > modularity, not a revolution or a replacement. We are excited by ELN, Or: you could discard modularity for RHEL 9. My experience with recent Fedora releases and RHEL 8 has been that it's been destabilizing to active and to build environments, with no detectable benefit. Can you, or can anyone else, cite a single issue it has helped with? Especially one that was not better resolved with other existing deployment tools, such as /etc/alternatives or version pinning? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
