Re: RHEL 9 and modularity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 9:29 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 18. 06. 20 15:24, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> Basically this email just says "We decided for Modularity in RHEL 9 and
> >> we would like to do it in Fedora Infrastructure first".
> > Mostly, yes.  We were told there was ambiguity on whether modularity
> > would be used in RHEL 9 or not.  Very clearly it will, so I wanted to
> > get ahead of that.
>
> I wonder where did this ambiguity came from. I always considered this as a very
> well known fact, but thanks for saying it explicitly, Josh.

I have found that it doesn't matter how much I think something is well
understood or clear, there is always someone that doesn't know or got
a different variation of the story.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

In any case, happy to make it explicit.

josh
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux