Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CMake to do out-of-source builds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 1:49 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_to_do_out-of-source_builds
>
> == Summary ==
> <code>%cmake</code> macro will be adjusted (<code>-B</code> parameter)
> to use separate build folder (already standardized
> <code>%{_vpath_builddir}</code> macro). Additionally,
> <code>%cmake_build</code>, <code>%cmake_install</code> and
> <code>%ctest</code> macro will be created (and backported to the older
> supported Fedora releases) to perform various operations that are
> commonly used with CMake in a backend-agnostic (Makefiles, Ninja,
> etc.) way.
>
> Packages that will stop building are trivial to fix and will be
> adjusted either by maintainers or change owners.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:ignatenkobrain|Igor Raits]], [[User:besser82|Björn
> Esser]], [[User:ngompa|Neal Gompa]]
> * Email: ignatenkobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, besser82@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx
>
> == Detailed Description ==
> Historically, software builds had a singular build configuration and
> required running the build within the project root. Nowadays, there
> are many build modes and options that can be configured in projects,
> different build settings (e.g. compiler flags) / types (release,
> debug) that can be applied and different tools that can be used to
> actually execute builds (compilers like gcc/clang, build job
> schedulers like make/ninja, and so on). Thus, CMake upstream strongly
> discourages users of doing in-source builds and recommends doing
> out-of-source builds.
>
> From <code>cmake.1</code>:
>
> <pre>
> To maintain a pristine source tree, perform an out-of-source build by
> using a separate dedicated build tree. An in-source build in which the
> build tree is placed in the same directory as the source tree is also
> supported, but discouraged.
> </pre>
>
> The other part of the change is introduction of additional macros is
> creation of set of macro that can build, install and run tests in a
> backend-agnostic, vpath-aware (out-of-source, in-source) way.
>
> === Migration ===
>
> ==== <code>%cmake</code> + <code>%(make|ninja)_(build|install)</code> ====
>
> There are multiple paths to complete the migration:
>
> * Add <code>-C "%{_vpath_builddir}"</code> to the <code>%(make|ninja)_*</code>
> * Replace <code>%(make|ninja)_build</code> and
> <code>%(make|ninja)_install</code> with <code>%cmake_build</code> and
> <code>%cmake_install</code> respectively
> * Redefine vpath builddir <code>%global _vpath_builddir .</code> to
> continue performing in-source builds (and optionally converting to the
> <code>%cmake_*</code>)
>
> Depending on the package, one of these options may be used to adapt to
> this change.
>
> ==== <code>%cmake -B builddir</code> +
> <code>%(make|ninja)_(build|install) -C builddir</code> ====
>
> No changes are needed.
>
> == Benefit to Fedora ==
> * Follow CMake upstream recommendations when building packages
> * Brings Fedora package builds more in-line with how upstream projects
> expect them to be built
> * Improve compatibility with other RPM distributions that already do this
> * Support backend-agnostic way of building CMake projects
>
> == Scope ==
> * Proposal owners: Implement necessary macros, try to build packages
> that <code>BuildRequires: cmake</code> in a side tag, analyze failures
> and fix the relevant ones (introduced by this change).
> * Other developers: While proposal owners will try to fix all affected
> packages, there might be some cases where package is already FTBFS so
> the fix can't be performed. Other package maintainers will have to fix
> the issue themselves after they fix FTBFS.
> * Release engineering: [https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9524 #9524]
> * Policies and guidelines: CMake page will be adjusted to mention
> newly created macros and the documentation about relevant VPATH macros
> needs to be restructured a bit (they are already documented on the
> Meson page, they need to be moved to the separate page and referenced
> both from CMake and Meson page).
> * Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
>
> == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
> Existing packages can (and most likely will) become FTBFS, but
> proposal owners will fix as many Fedora packages as possible. However
> fixing third-party packages is not possible and out of scope.
> Third-party packagers will need to adapt based on the recommendations
> noted in this Change.
>
> == How To Test ==
> # Grab the new cmake RPM from the Koji sidetag (TBC)
> # Try to build package that uses <code>%cmake</code>,
> <code>%cmake_build</code>, <code>%cmake_install</code> and
> <code>%ctest</code> macro
>
> == User Experience ==
> The end-users (non-packagers) will not notice any changes.
>
> == Dependencies ==
> There are around 1100 RPMs in Fedora that depend on CMake at
> build-time. All proposal owners are provenpackagers so they are able
> to commit necessary fixes. No external dependencies.
>
> == Contingency Plan ==
> * Contingency mechanism: Proposal owners will adjust macros to not do
> out-of-source builds by default, but will preserve newly created macro
> (essentially to bring them to the targeted state of older supported
> Fedora releases).
> * Contingency deadline: Beta freeze.
> * Blocks release? No
>
> == Documentation ==
> The only place that needs to be adjusted is packaging guidelines.
+1

This is very similar to what I suggested in
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cmake/pull-request/4 a couple of
months ago.

Nice work!

Christoph
>
>
> --
> Ben Cotton
> He / Him / His
> Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream
> Red Hat
> TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



-- 
Christoph Junghans
Web: http://www.compphys.de
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux