I can't speak to the implementation of this, but I am in favour of the approach in general, with one caveat: I think it is important to implement this in a way that makes it possible for users to keep *individual* retired packages around. Blacklisting fedora-retired-packages is too broad a brush from the user perspective, and will make it much harder to identify problems. A question regarding this: What would happen if an update to fedora-retired-packages obsoletes a package that is present on my system but listed in dnf's excludepkgs? Christopher _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
