On Sat, 30 May 2020 18:43:03 +0200, you wrote: >If I understand correctly, the sudden disappearance of llvm7.0 means that >now ghc is in danger as a package, because it's missing the toolchain >needed to build & package it? Don't know anything about ghc to comment on the difficulties, but ghc 8.10.1 was released 2 months ago and uses llvm 9 >However, https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages lists only llvm9.0 and >llvm10.0 builds. > >I think it's an interesting problem in general. Perhaps it would be good to >have at least 1 extra version of GCC and LLVM other than the current >mainline? Isn't that already happening though with both llvm (10) and llvm9.0 being available in Fedora 32? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
