On Sat, 30 May 2020 00:58:26 +0200, Chris Murphy wrote: > The Fedora Workstation working group recognizes hibernation can be > useful, but due to impediments it's currently not practical to support > it. TL;DR let's go the s2idle way as that is the only one which may work. But for me it resumes immediately again (similar to the "suspend" Bugs below). Also I had to do 'echo freeze >/sys/power/state' for s2idle as systemctl has no such option (nor there is any GUI option for s3idle AFAIK). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The problem is "suspend" depends on computer BIOS, sometimes it does not work and due to the BIOS it is difficult/impossible to debug: Kernel fails to suspend due to rmi_smbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480602 Cannot successfully suspend, machine starts again after a few seconds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781566 Bugs in "suspend" are also mentioned in the first article about "S3": https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/V5MOCX23KU45J3WXUN6TCGEJYQLXQYUL/ I agree hibernation also sometimes does not work for me (in 20% cases it just suddenly reboots during resuming); X1 Carbon 6th gen (Red Hat one). Having both suspend & resume was useful one had a chance at least one of them works sometimes. If the 'out of the box' installations will no longer offer the hibernation option it means less compatibility with hardware. Jan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
