On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 02:08:51PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 13:36 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:11:49PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > > I'm sending you round to gather examples because while it's intuitively > > > obvious that /etc/rc.modules is useful, it really has no reason to exist. > > > > The capabilities modules were mentioned a couple times, e.g. any > > module that has no detectable hardware or no hardware at all mapped > > to. > > but capabilities as a module is a big mistake and even a security > hole ;) No, it's not, if you want to replace it with something better. > So please give another, more realistic example.... You are the kernel guru, never seen any non-hardware modules? ;) Choosing netfilter/netscheduling modules also comes to mind ... -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpKzN8bjCQXc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
