Hi Mattia, Mattia Verga via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi all, > > now that we have new detailed statistics about new package review > tickets ( https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ ) I would like > to make some cleanings... at the time I'm writing, there are 517 tickets > listed as new, many of them are older than 5 years! > > The first steps I would like to do, if FESCO and community agree, are: > > - some of these tickets are marked as "dependency rejected"; that means > they depend on other package review tickets that were rejected, for > whichever reason, so they will never get approved either. I would like > to just close these (there are 3 tickets in this state) > - following the Policy for stalled package reviews [1], I would like to > mass comment on tickets submitted before 1/1/2017 (more than 3 years > old) asking the submitter if they're still interested in continue with > the review process and mark the ticket as NEEDINFO. After one month > without reply I will close the ticket, as per policy. > > Then there are 352 tickets listed as "review in progress", but that's > also not true. Here we have tickets with review-flag set to ? (review in > progress) or + (package approved) since 2013. There are even some > tickets for which the git repo as been generated. > These tickets probably need a manual check to choose the best course of > action. Some of those packages have been approved and imported in > Fedora, some of these have been later retired also from repositories... > but the review ticket has never been closed. > I would propose to: > > - if the package got approved and it's still in repos, just close the > review ticket as CURRENTRELEASE > - if the package got approved and was later removed from repos, just > close the review ticket as NOTABUG > - if the package got approved before 1/1/2019, but never imported in > repos, clear the review-flag and assignee and mark as NEEDINFO from the > submitter asking if they're still interested in this (we probably need > to decide what to do if the git repo has been already set up) > - if the package got approved before 1/1/2020, but never imported in > repos, do not clear the approval and mark as NEEDINFO from the submitter > asking if they're still interested in this > - for tickets with last change marked before 1/1/2019, if the > review-flag is set to be IN-PROGRESS, mark the ticket as NEEDINFO from > either the submitter or the reviewer > > Let me know if you agree (or disagree) with this proposal. Sounds good to me. Thanks for taking care of this! Cheers, Dan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
