On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 06:49:43PM -0400, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: > Because it's no longer easily/immediately available. And nowadays > it doesn't much matter if things are or aren't possible, but rather > if they are easily or not accessible. More often then not, if someting > is not working right out of the gate, it's not available for all intents > and purposes. And neither would anything that *uses* gtk+ be easily/immediately available, by your same argument. So why include gtk+-1.2? John Thacker
Attachment:
pgpnQPKJ2vi4g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
