Re: Aggressive updating (Python 3.9): Are we trying to hard?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:39 PM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dne 19. 05. 20 v 14:03 Richard Shaw napsal(a):
> > Because Qt 5.13.x / PySide2 5.13.x is NOT compatible with Python 3.8. But instead of asking ourselves, "should we push
> > in the VERY latest Python and hope it's ok?", we just patch the build system to accept it anyway and hope for the best.
> >
> > Qt (et all) is a pretty organized upstream, so when asked about Python 3.8 support in 5.13.x, they said, "Nope. Wait for
> > 5.14.x."
> >
>
> BTW this is scholar example of use-case for Modularity.

For *python*? Just..... no. the overlap of python modules among and
alongside each  other would be extraordinarily destabilizing. That was
wha the "python2dist" and python3dist" macros provided when used
consistently, so that suites of software could be "python27" or
"python36" prefixed.

The software package name prefixing could be pesky, but was far
simpler to manage.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux