On Tue, 2020-05-12 at 16:19 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 03:13:42PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:51:03PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 12. 05. 20 8:49, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > Finally, does everyone agree about the original request: > > > > "remove all maintainers > > > > of retired packages"? Or should we bring this to FESCo? > > > > > > If the procedure is "remove all maintainers if all branches are > > > retired or > > > EOL" than yes, this is a good thing. However, not sure if worth > > > spending > > > energy on. What are the benefits over status quo? > > > > Someone asked us to look into this, so I did, briefly. > > I am also very happy to close the ticket as "Won't fix" and move on > > :) > > I think it might be worth it... it makes it more clear how many > packages > someone maintains and what their status is. As someone who found himself in the list 3 times I would be very much in favor of removing myself as maintainer of these packages :) And since the script has already been written and it works, I would be in favor of deploying it somewhere where it runs periodically. Tadej _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
