Dne 12. 05. 20 v 14:51 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > On 12. 05. 20 8:49, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> Finally, does everyone agree about the original request: "remove all >> maintainers >> of retired packages"? Or should we bring this to FESCo? > > If the procedure is "remove all maintainers if all branches are > retired or EOL" than yes, this is a good thing. However, not sure if > worth spending energy on. What are the benefits over status quo? > For example to be able to see if some packager is active or not? Why the Pagure user page [1] should show that somebody maintains some package while it is actually not true? In this specific case, there are listed 4 EOL packages. If you think it is not worth spending the time to provide the correct information, then maybe this whole page should be removed from Pagure, because it has no value ATM. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/skottler/projects _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
