Le mercredi 06 avril 2005 Ã 14:18 -0400, seth vidal a Ãcrit : > > Not too hard a trick if FC4's openoffice includes > > Obsoletes: openoffice.org2 > > Provides: openoffice.org2 > > (or whatever name is used for a possible OpenOffice 2.0 Extras package > > for fc3) > > okay, how about we say no b/c it's silly and confusing for users. > > the point of extras is not to obsolete functionality in core. > > no, b/c it's a waste of time. Moreover how about "extras can depend on core features but core should not have to track extras, especially another release extras ?" The trick work but is a priority inversion if I've ever seen one. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
