On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 11:27 -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > Here is where we differ. I think cElementTree is a much better XML > parsing library than libxml2 for use in python. Here's the shoot-out: > > 1. It's faster > 2. It has a smaller memory footprint > 3. It follows python conventions > 4. It results in nicer python code I think the worst in this thread is to see you guys comparing apples to oranges, and neither side understanding the issue. Daniel: they're complaining about the python bindings of libxml2, not libxml2, cool down. Guys: don't accuse libxml2 when the problem is the bindings part. You're creating an automatic "ears-wide-shut" on Daniel by complaining about libxml2 when you're complaining in fact of another level entirely. Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
