On Apr 5, 2005 8:03 PM, Mike Chambers <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I took a look at that, and that is WAY too long. I don't see why the > listed packages need to be in there, as far as what is added, removed, > etc.. I would think those could be listed to something on a URL > somewhere as a link or something along those lines. Maybe major changes > with certain packages, such as kernel, gcc, glibc, xorg, etc.. Are you just picking nits a bit here? making the 'release notes' include urls to details like added,removed etc... is just adding complexity without addressing the underlying issue about how to get the detailed material written. Someone still has to write those details no matter where exactly they are. No matter how you divided the information up.. if its expected to be available at release time.. its a release note. Which of the little modules to include in the document that ships in the isos and which of the little modules to only make available as urls in the fedora website is a decision you make after you have the little modules written. Lets worry about getting modules written and then worry about the problem of too many modules. -jef
