Re: Field3D abipkgdiff significant?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:53 AM Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So Field3D had a patch release a while ago and I build the package for Rawhide but haven't decided to build for F31+ because I can't tell if the abi changes are significant or not and I don't want to rebuild all the dependencies.
>
> Can someone let me know if this is safe?

Adding functions and variables is okay.  The only concern is the 8
changed variables.  If they are not referenced by any consumers of
Field3D, then updating is okay.  I get the impression that those are
internal variables (because they are static and have a version number
in their names).  If you can confirm that these variables are not
referenced directly by any Field3D consumers, then go ahead and build
the update.  Otherwise, you will need to rebuild all consumers to be
sure the update doesn't cause breakage.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux