On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 2:11 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Correction, this is valid: > > https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0440/#local-version-identifiers > > But in this package case, we don't want version 0, so valid, but wrong. > > > Followup on the generator problem: > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1183 > > - the traceback should say: Cannot process Python package version: 0+unknown > - the build should abort on errors > - the version is actually valid Thanks for the detective work, Miro. I wish this upstream would just release a new version. Anyway, now that I know what the immediate problem is, I'll try to work around it. Regards, -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
