On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 1:43 AM Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 06:55:10 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > For kernel updates this is probably not a good idea. Given that updates > > potentially introduce regressions, being able to distinguish updates with > > known CVEs that we do need to roll out immediately, versus other updates we > > can do more compatibility testing on, is critical. > > Even when there is a kernel regression a -1 vote gets immediately overvoted by > the +1s of majority so the update gets pushed anyway. So I do not see what is > the purpose of the voting at all. As an example: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-3cd64d683c#comment-1258825 > = kernel-5.5.6-201.fc31 > You will also notice that kernels do not push with autokarma or auto time based push to stable for exactly this reason. Sometimes the number of bugs fixed are worth pushing through a regression that is hitting just a few users. I look at every single response. There are kernels which do not get pushed to stable due to feedback. For any non rawhide kernel to be pushed to stable, we read the feedback, make the call and have to go manually click the button to push it, intentionally. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
