Le mardi 05 avril 2005 Ã 13:22 -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev a Ãcrit : > On Apr 5, 2005 12:28 PM, Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > If yum was already using libxml2, then it required more effort to switch > > to cElementTree. So why wasn't constructive work done to _improve_ the > > Python bindings for libxml2? Is there a list of items that need > > improvement, and where are the bugs filed against libxml2 for each of > > those items? > > Because it was a lot less effort to switch to cElementTree. Simple as that. > It would have taken a lot more effort otherwise. Is your time free? What's right at the app level is not always right at the distro level. Given the _huge_ scope of XML standards focusing on a single core engine (instead of a score of offerings that all do the same easy parts and fail on the hard ones) makes some sort of sense. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
