On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:18:02 -0500 Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > NetworkManager has three DNS backends: default (nss-dns, what we use > currently), dnsmasq, and systemd-resolved. The default backend just > does the wrong thing and cannot be fixed. When either dnsmasq or > systemd-resolved is in use, NetworkManager will go ahead and do the > right thing by telling dnsmasq/systemd-resolved which network > interfaces should be used to resolve which hostnames. I consulted > with the NetworkManager developers and they recommended > systemd-resolved over dnsmasq, although I understand that dnsmasq is > good too. Will the ability to turn off NetworkManager involvement in DNS in the configuration file (None) still remain? I use a local caching DNS server, and had to do that in order to allow it to run without interference / override by NetworkManager. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
