On Apr 5, 2005 11:37 AM, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't remember seeing a bug report about it :) ah crap.. i was confused... repoclosure was the thing that wasnt working for me last time i tried.... > Basically .. why not. The problem ATM is that repoquery uses yum's cache > and config so there's no direct, easy way to specify an arbitrary > metadata set for purposes like this. On my todo-list though... well no EASY way... but what if i was sneaky and had 2 different yum configurations or something? Any amount of script/configuration file magic is going be far preferable to having to cache all of rawhide locally. The goal is to check to make sure we all have an accurate picture of which packages have been dropped every "reasonably useful period of time" or so days. -jef"repothis repothat"spaleta
