Re: git-core deps under f32

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

clime wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I very much appreciate the git-core package but there seems to be some
> change under f32 which makes it download many more deps during
> installation.
> 
> This is f32:
> 
> $ mock -r fedora-32-x86_64 install git-core
> ...
> =========================
> Package
> =========================
> Installing:
> git-core
> Installing dependencies:
> acl
> cryptsetup-libs
> dbus
> dbus-broker
> dbus-common
> device-mapper
> device-mapper-libs
> fipscheck
> fipscheck-lib
> gnutls
> iptables-libs
> json-c
> kmod-libs
> less
> libargon2
> libcbor
> libedit
> libfido2
> libmnl
> libnetfilter_conntrack
> libnfnetlink
> libpcap
> libseccomp
> nettle
> openssh
> openssh-clients
> qrencode-libs
> systemd
> systemd-pam
> systemd-rpm-macros
> 
> Transaction Summary
> =========================
> Install  31 Packages
> 
> Total size: 14 M
> Installed size: 60 M
> ...
> 
> This is f31:
> ...
> =========================
> Package
> =========================
> Installing:
> git-core
> Installing dependencies:
> fipscheck
> fipscheck-lib
> less
> libedit
> openssh
> openssh-clients
> 
> Transaction Summary
> =========================
> Install  7 Packages
> 
> Total download size: 6.1 M
> Installed size: 35 M
> ...
> 
> It seems the f32's git-core got many more deps for some reason, even
> such as dbus-broker or systemd.

Out of curiosity, do you notice the same deps if you install
git-core-2.26.0 from:

    https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/git-maint/git/

on f31?

I'll try to poke a bit in the next few days as I can make
some time.  I had not noticed the inflated depchain.  Thank
you for pointing it out.

Off hand, there's nothing which comes to mind as a newly
added dependency in the git-core package that I would expect
to pull in much more on f32.

Is it possible that the chroot which mock provides for f32
is smaller than for f31 and the new deps aren't so much new
as newly exposed?  (I haven't checked that at all, so it's
just an idle thought.)

If nothing jumps out as a result of this thread, it might be
good to file this in bugzilla so we can track it there.

-- 
Todd

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux