Re: Announcing start of DNF 5 development

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 23:56 +0000, Tom Seewald wrote:
> Yep, I just ran "dnf info kernel" and then right after that "dnf
> changelog kernel", in both cases dnf spent over 20 seconds syncing. 
> I haven't seen other package managers require this much network
> traffic, and I wonder if a lot of it could be avoided.

If you only want to query *locally installed* packages, you can just
use rpm:

rpm -qi kernel
rpm -q --changelog kernel

if you use DNF, it will get the info for packages that are in the
repositories but not locally installed, as well. changelogs are kept
and retrieved separately, I believe, as they aren't needed for any
other operations, so that's why you see remote trips on both commands,
I think.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux