> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 12:10 pm, Adam Williamson > <adamwill(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > $100/month per user for Ultimate (the only offering that meets the > "requirements")... 2339 packages in FAS... so $233900 * 12 works out to > roughly $3 million per year just for Fedora, assuming we never let > anybody other than approved Fedora packagers use the instance. Or in > terms of salary: a couple dozen software developers, more or less. > > I wonder if that's really more cost-effective than hiring a couple more > infrastructure devs.... Ignoring the core values and wasting money on outsourcing the problems at the same time? Sounds like capitalism to me ;) Joking aside, openSUSE will not be publicly deploying GitLab due to many of our contributors disagreeing with the open core development model, and we were hoping to use Pagure, since it does have the features our contributors wanted to have in the forge. Also some of my excitement for the forgefed is showing through. However reading through this thread I do get the feeling that there is largely no interest in developing Pagure, despite the fact it is pretty much the only forge with the features that make it easy to replace GitHub with it (and even moreso since Microsoft started getting GitHub to actually focus on similar areas as Pagure has been for years). Disappointing. LCP [Stasiek] https://lcp.world _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
