On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 2:36 PM Randy Barlow <bowlofeggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 4/4/20 3:02 PM, Aoife Moloney wrote: > > However we do > > recognize that it was still nonetheless a decision that was not made > > in public, and for that we can only now offer our apologies for this > > mistake and learn a hard lesson from it. > > It's simply not true that this is the only thing that can be done. You > can hold off on making a decision, and follow an open process instead. > > > We do want to let you know that we deeply appreciate the requirements > > you have given us and would like to ask you to continue engaging with > > us while we are moving through our next steps with GitLab. > > What would be the goal if the community were to continue to engage with > CPE management when it has demonstrated that it does not meaningfully > engage with the community? I agree. Treating this as a fait accompli is not a good idea. There's been a trust reducing event. Repairing the damage should happen before further actions requiring trust are taken. Flaws have been discovered in the process used to arrive at the decision, and therefore it's not clear whether the decision is valid. The mistake has been admitted, and treating it as moot suggests in fact nothing has been learned from the mistake. -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
