Re: Why is "local" insecure PATH element ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 3:58 PM Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 11:26:04AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 4/1/20 4:27 AM, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> > > I've noticed some failures in automated tests in bodhi, specifically
> > > this one:
> > >
> > >      {
> > >         "arch" : "x86_64",
> > >         "code" : "SuspiciousPath",
> > >         "context" : {
> > >       "excerpt" : [
> > >          "PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin"
> > >       ],
> > >       "path" : "/usr/sbin/e2scrub"
> > >         },
> > >         "diag" : "Potentially insecure PATH element <tt>/local</tt>",
> > >         "subpackage" : "e2scrub"
> > >      },
> > >
> > > I am not sure why it's considered insecure while on all of the Fedora
> > > and RHEL systems I have available "/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin" is a
> > > default part of the PATH.
> >
> > You don't want a system script to be looking for executables in /usr/local
> > before the regular bin directories.  And it's probably better that it
> > doesn't look in /usr/local at all.
> > It's fine for the admin to put extra things in /usr/local, but those paths
> > don't override the system ones.
>
> Thanks, that's understandable, but then why the PATH on my system is
>
> /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin
>
> or
>
> /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/root/bin
>
> all the systems I try include /usr/local in the PATH.
>

We don't want anything installed via RPM to be using /usr/local
directly. The /usr/local path is intended for locally-installed
content by the administrator, while /usr is meant for content coming
from the distributor.

For example, I maintain the `npm` package. It installs its binary as
/usr/bin/npm.  However, if I use npm (it's a Node.js package manager)
to install a Node-based binary with `npm -g install someapp`, it will
install it in /usr/local rather than /usr. This is done in part to
avoid future conflicts where RPM might try to overwrite
locally-installed content or where a tool like `npm` is overwriting
RPM-managed content (which it was doing until fairly recently...)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux