Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: java-11-openjdk as system JDK in F33

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/30/20 5:11 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 30. 03. 20 16:04, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> === Other ===
>> * Proposal owners:
>> ** based on above, adapt jdk8 and jdk11 package provides
>> ** If necessary tune the build environment
>>
>> * Other developers:
>> ** based on selected approach to tune the main build tools
>> *** at least jpackage-tools and maven will be very likely affected
>> ** based on selected approach to tune the rpmbuild/macros
>> ** many java package maintainers will maybe need to adapt theirs packages
>> *** After the approach is agreed, mass rebuild must be performed
>> *** FTBFS bugs connected with this proposal, maybe with jira ticket to
>> allow discussion.

Thank you for bringing it up!
> 
> I don't understand who does all the hard work. Will the change owners just change the default and go
> away, or will the change owners handle the rebuilds?

We will handle the tuning of jdk8 and jdk11 rpms. Also we will do an initial testing if it does what
it should.
Once it is done, mass rebuild is launched. we will then see. But it will be in on individual package
owners to fix theirs packages.
We will definitely help where necessary or where needed, and will most likely gather the most common
cases, but to push to not-owned repos... only in critical cases.

Of course we can reconsider, but it is not on powers of few (5?) individuals to fix 2500 packages,
even if it will be only two or three most common cases.

As for the runtime part, it is another story. There again we will do everything necessary to fix the
problems both usptream and downstream, but the runtime casaes will flow up only in later stages of
lifecycle  of f33. Possibly even after f33 release.  Note, that if there is serious runtime issues,
then it would be really poorly written usptream application or very outdated downstream, not broken
migration. Still the help will be attempted to be provided.

> 
> As a side not, please don't mix in Jira tickets, that sounds RH internal to me.

Sure. If I did, then not intentionally. By jira ticket in the above  I had in mind general ticket on
pagure or similarly. The word jira did not belonged here. fixed the doc.
> 
Thanx!
 thanx a lot,
    J.

-- 
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
Red Hat Czech
jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx    M: +420775390109
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux