On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 22:25 -0500, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Build System wrote:
> > gimp-2:2.2.4-10
> > ---------------
> > * Tue Mar 29 2005 Nils Philippsen <nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > - revert gtk requirement change
>
> Out of curiosity, why was this done?
Mainly maintainability -- without that change I don't have to do
anything besides using a different release tag between Rawhide/FC4 and
FC3. You could argue that FC4 gimp needs gtk >= 2.6.x because it was
built with it (I don't know whether apps built with 2.6.x could be run
against 2.4.x, I doubt it) but I don't want to encode that in the source
RPM/spec file.
> gtk-update-icon-cache does not exist in gtk2-2.4.14 and thus the %
> post and %postun scripts now fail when on a system with that version
> of gtk2.
Nope (you should know, you wrote the scriptlet in question ;-):
[...]
if [ -x /usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then
gtk-update-icon-cache %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
fi
[...]
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
