Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25. 03. 20 12:37, Fabio Valentini wrote:
So let's assume for the sake of the argument, that Python is broken in ELN and
the Python maintainers don't want 0%{?rhel}/0%{?eln} conditionals in their spec
files. Now all 3600+ Python packages will fail to build in ELN because of this
and the feedback provided in bodhi will be moot. What will happen then?
What about using an additional "eln" branch in dist-git?

- For most packages, the master branch should be able to be merged
into eln regularly (or even automatically, triggered by master
commits).
- For the packages that need "unacceptable in master" adjustments, an
automatic rebase on top of new master commits could be attempted, and
if that fails, human intervention is necessary anyway.

Yes, that makes sense to me. Especially with automation (bacause without it, the branch would simply get stalled, you cannot rebase all Fedora packages manually at this scale).

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux