Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 7:45 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:37 PM Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:53 PM David Cantrell
> > <david.l.cantrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > > Similarly, a package with a medium CVE NEW bugzilla would be orphaned after 4
> > > > reminders (after 9-12 weeks), retired at a point if still not CLOSED after 4 months.
> > > >
> > > > With low severity, that is 6 reminders (after 15-18 weeks), retired at a point
> > > > if still not CLOSED after 6 months (similarly to the current policy).
> > >
> > > Where do get bug severity information?
> >
> > Fedora Workstation WG has an issue "Reconsider updates policy" that
> > relates to this question.
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/107
> >
> > If there are any security updates, GNOME Software pops up a
> > notification to install them. This thwarts attempts to avoid nagging
> > the user, because so many updates contain some sort of security
> > mitigation. One proposal is to not treat security updates as special,
> > and still wait until a week has passed for the update.
> >
> > But the contra argument is, well what if there is an urgent security fix?
> >
> > The repo metadata, I guess, needs some way of distinguishing urgent vs
> > non-urgent security updates, so that GNOME Software knows whether to
> > notify the user accordingly. But is there a reliable way of
> > distinguishing between urgent and non-urgent security updates? I'd
> > informally suggest "urgent" is something that should be applied today
> > or tomorrow. Anything else can wait a week or two.
> >

(snip)

> The repo metadata has the property, so packagers just have to set it
> in Bodhi when submitting updates. It defaults to unspecified.

It *does* default to unspecified, yes. However, when submitting an
update of type "security", bodhi won't let you even submit the update
unless you set the severity to something other than "unspecified".

Fabio

>
> --
> 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux