Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, February 13, 2020 1:34:32 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:53 PM David Cantrell
> <david.l.cantrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> > > Similarly, a package with a medium CVE NEW bugzilla would be orphaned
> > > after 4
 reminders (after 9-12 weeks), retired at a point if still not
> > > CLOSED after 4 months.> >
> > >
> > >
> > > With low severity, that is 6 reminders (after 15-18 weeks), retired at a
> > > point if still not CLOSED after 6 months (similarly to the current
> > > policy).>
> >
> >
> > Where do get bug severity information?
> 
> 
> Fedora Workstation WG has an issue "Reconsider updates policy" that
> relates to this question.
> https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/107
> 
> If there are any security updates, GNOME Software pops up a
> notification to install them. This thwarts attempts to avoid nagging
> the user, because so many updates contain some sort of security
> mitigation. One proposal is to not treat security updates as special,
> and still wait until a week has passed for the update.
> 
> But the contra argument is, well what if there is an urgent security fix?
> 
> The repo metadata, I guess, needs some way of distinguishing urgent vs
> non-urgent security updates, so that GNOME Software knows whether to
> notify the user accordingly. But is there a reliable way of
> distinguishing between urgent and non-urgent security updates? I'd
> informally suggest "urgent" is something that should be applied today
> or tomorrow. Anything else can wait a week or two.

That's an entirely subjective thing. I'd recommend prompting to install ALL 
security updates immediately, but why not just give the user an option for 
security updates? This is what Mac and Windows do, and it makes sense because 
it's really the user's opinion of security updates that matter on their 
system.


-- 
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux