On 07. 02. 20 15:30, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
I'd like to ask for your input about this service. Is it worth keeping? Is it
duplicating what the CI pipeline does?
Is someone interested in working on it?
It's worth keeping. It's absolutely the best thing and when it doesn't work for
a while, I always feel like we're back couple years where I need to submit
scrachbuilds for package changes myself :)
There are several pros over Fedora CI:
- it happens on every package, no configuration required
(especially important when submitting PRs to packages I don't maintain)
- it happens fast
(Fedora CI starts a VM etc. and it takes a while before the build starts)
- it happens on all arches
(Fedora CI limits the build to x86_64)
- the Koji link is easily accessible
(Fedora CI brings you to a very complicated log where you need to find it)
I don't know much about deploying to OpenShift, but I'd be interested in helping
to work on this service code wise:
- create SRPM on "native" mock config
- don't download sources from the Source URL
- don't require config update after each branching
PS Thanks for creating this. It saves an enormous amount of time.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
