Re: RFC: Security policy adjustments to make it easier to implement and more friendly to maintainers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 29. 01. 20 22:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 10:26:56PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Here is an initial (albeit randomly generated) proposal of X and Y:

severity   CRITICAL/HIGH     MEDIUM      LOW
     X             2             4         6
     Y             2             4         6

In RHEL, low impact security bugs wouldn't normally be fixed until the
next minor release, which would be 6-12 months after the issue is
reported.  I don't think it's valuable to badger packagers about bugs
that have "minimal consequences" to use the terminology from

https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification


My idea was that within half a year, it should be wither fixed or CLOSED as WONTFIX or UPSTREAM. If we don't agree, I'm completely fine making it 12 months or even ignore such bugs in the policy entirely.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux