On Tuesday, January 21, 2020 10:20:10 AM CET Vít Ondruch wrote: > I would expect that adding some keyword such as "[skip changelog]" (there are > quite commonly used similar hints for CI nowadays [1]) would instruct the > generator to leave the second commit out of the changelog, because it does not > provide any additional value to user. Yes, but people can forget to put there the keyword, and push - and later still affect the %changelog - and so we would have to have a way to adjust changelog by "patch" or something. Again, as example, take a look at gnulib, to build-aux/gitlog-to-changelog and it treats *.amend files, --ignore-matching, --ignore-line, etc. > > In ideal world, shouldn't the bodhi change description be equivalent to > > %changelog, or at least a super-set of %changelog? If these were equivalent, > > maintainers woudl have to think more about %changelog. > > > Don't forget that single Bodhi update might ship several builds. Correct, no need to not provide all the %changelogs. Pavel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
