Re: FYI: OCaml 4.10.0 beta1 will go into Fedora 32 soonish

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 04:38:27PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 1:09 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > OCaml 4.10.0 beta1 was released upstream about a week ago
> > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673688).  I'm intending
> > to build OCaml packages into a side tag starting today, and then
> > if it seems to work well integrate it into F32.
> >
> > The release notes for this are here:
> >
> >   https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/blob/4.10/Changes
> >
> > Please note there are some incompatible changes.  The ones which I
> > think may affect Fedora are below (but there are more, please read the
> > release notes in full):
> 
> How will this change the number of OCaml packages that are already
> broken in rawhide? Will it get better or worse with this rebuild?
> There seem to be a number of OCaml packages that haven't even been
> built with either 4.08 or 4.09 yet.
>
> OCaml packages cause most of the "broken dependencies" in rawhide
> right now, and drown out almost everything else:
> See: https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/master/f/reports/report-rawhide.md

This is the first I've heard of this.  I can't fix stuff I don't
know about!

I've just looked at the link you posted, and it seems a bit "biased"
to OCaml packages because of the way that Fedora packages encode OCaml
dependencies into RPM dependencies, resulting in many ocaml(Stdlib_*)
dependencies which are essentially saying the same thing.

There are many packages in the list which are orphaned, especially all
the camlp4 deprecations[1].  Those should be ignored IMO.

As for the rest, not sure I can action anything unless I can get a
list of actually broken packages which are not orphaned.  But don't do
anything until the current rebuild is out of the way.

About the current rebuild: I finally fixed a bunch of problems with my
rebuild script (which I'm writing at the same time, see [2]) - but now
Koji seems to be actually broken ...

Rich.

[1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/G2JBIWB423ECYGBXZ3QCPR7NQ66XGXTU/

[2] https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2020/01/14/goals-an-experimental-new-tool-which-generalizes-make/


-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.  Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux