Dne 15. 01. 20 v 13:33 Panu Matilainen napsal(a): > On 1/15/20 2:13 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> Dne 13. 01. 20 v 14:05 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >>> %changelog >>> >>> %include changelog >> >> +1 >> > > As I pointed out in > https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/942, %include is > nasty because it breaks the stand-alone attribute of specs. There are > umphteen dupes and variants of bugs about systemd.spec's use of > %include breaking this and that use pattern that aren't systemd's > fault, it's just that %include isn't as useful as it initially seems. Would it be helpful to open RPM upstream ticket to discuss when the missing included file is problematic and whether there should be other graceful variant of include? May be the %include should always behave gracefully, because (S)RPM build is going to always fail due to missing files specified by Source directive. Vít > > - Panu - > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
