On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 17:30, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:19:49AM -0600, Martin Jackson wrote: > > In this vein (as other people have commented on this thread), I > > think it would be great to give Fedora more visibility. Its absence > > as a supported image in Azure, for instance, is particularly > > noticeable, and the whole situation with WSL was regrettable. One > > of the reasons I've used Ubuntu/Debian in some of those situations > > is that they're there and relatively easy to consume. I've come to > > prefer Fedora because it has much better leading-edge stuff, and I > > think that's a huge benefit to the community that definitely serves > > a particular segment. > > For what it's worth, we do continue to work on these things. It's difficult > because we really do need to make sure we have solid legal protection. About the whole issue of bringing Fedora to WSL, I remember that there were some "non-technical blockers" **two years ago**. So I assumed that, at this point, this was completely dead. If not, we're already late, very late. -- Iñaki Úcar _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
