On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 04:38:55AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 4:03 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel > <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Le samedi 11 janvier 2020 à 13:09 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit : > > > > > > The only reason I mentioned it is because since we distro-sync > > > between > > > releases, it doesn't actually matter as much as it used to. > > > > rawhide does not distro-sync (and some may say that rawhide does not > > matter, but early problem detection by rawhide users is one big reason > > distro sync works so well for other releases) It sometimes does. Sometimes it does not. > It is strongly recommended that you should be using 'dnf distro-sync' > for Rawhide if you want to use it as a daily driver. That handles all > the cases that occur in a rolling branch effectively. It does not. For example, right now on my laptop: Error: Problem: problem with installed package awscli-1.16.309-1.fc32.noarch - package awscli-1.16.309-1.fc32.noarch requires python3.8dist(botocore) = 1.13.45, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-botocore-1.13.45-2.fc32.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - awscli-1.16.309-1.fc32.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) (--skip-broken doesn't do anything here, same exact output) distro-sync is only going to work if the repo(s) are all consistent for you to sync to. :( Which I think we should get to, but it's not the case yet. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
