Hi, we recently did update to 5.13.2 which I think is enough for now. Main reason is that we need Plasma to properly work and Qt 5.12 and 5.13 are the only releases guaranteed to be compatible. There will definitely be people using upcoming Plasma version with Qt 5.14 so once it's properly tested and fixes on both Plasma and Qt side upstreamed and Plasma 5.18 works just fine, we can then start thinking about it. On úterý 7. ledna 2020 12:14:03 CET Damian Ivanov wrote: > Qt 5.14 is out since November. > I understand that it may not be suitable for 31 yet (why not? rebuilds?) > but at least should be in rawhide. > > It contains a bunch of fixes regarding high dpi and other stuff where > custom patches were carried out by Fedora are fixed now upstream. We do not really carry many Qt 5.14 fixes. If there are changes you are aware of which are worth backporting, you can let us know and we can include them. > Can we have Fedora Rawhide with Qt.5.14 or at least some copr or easy > way to rebuild the Qt rpms as 5.14 using fedpkg or rpmrebuild? Including a new Qt version in COPR is not a problem, problem is that many packages need rebuilds (from KF5, Plasma, etc.) and that's quite a lot of work. Regards, Jan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
