Chris Murphy wrote:
> It's untenable to consider ISO size alone. It is a legitimate concern, but
> it can't be reasonable to soak every single CPU, times thousands. You're
> willing to exchange less download time for longer install time and higher
> energy demand, but there are quite a lot of other uses occurring that are
> relevant.
Downloads also require energy, on the client, on the server, on the
intermediate hops, and even for the actual information transmission in the
cables. So I am not convinced that you are going to save any energy by
making the image significantly larger just so that it is faster to
decompress.
(As for the time factor, I already explained how that does not compute
either, at least in large, less-privileged parts of the world.)
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
