Brian C. Lane wrote: > I agree with Chris here, I think we should make the switch to plain > squashfs unless someone can come up something dramatic that it will > break :) Does SquashFS support all the advanced features that are needed, such as extended attributes (used at least by SELinux), file system capabilities, etc.? Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx