Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal (late): Enable EarlyOOM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Murphy wrote:
> It's not correct that the Workstation working group doesn't want to
> see it supported, it's a question of whether and to what degree it can
> be supported, and making sure users have expectations proper set. I
> wouldn't want users thinking it'll work by advertising that it does,
> and then it eats their data.
> 
> Does the hardware support it? Does the hardware properly advertise
> what it does support? What mechanisms are needed in the kernel and
> systemd to support it, and what to do when there are bugs that break
> it? It's not practical for the Fedora kernel team to become
> responsible for supporting it when it breaks, nor is it practical to
> block the release on such bugs.

The biggest issue is that "Secure Boot" (Restricted Boot) mode disables 
hibernation.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux