Re: Minimize systemd for kdump's initramfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 11:48:53AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 01/03/20 at 11:45am, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 01/02/20 at 09:02am, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 12:21:26AM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
> > > > Some component, like Systemd, have grown by a lot, here is a list of
> > > > the size of part of binaries along with the binaries they required in
> > > > F31:
> > > > /root/image/bin/systemctl
> > > > 20M     .
> > > > /root/image/usr/bin/systemctl
> > > > 20M     .
> > > > /root/image/usr/bin/systemd-cgls
> > > > 20M     .
> > > > /root/image/usr/bin/systemd-escape
> > > > 20M     .
> > > > /root/image/usr/bin/systemd-run
> > > > 20M     .
> > > > ...
> > > > 
> > > > There are overlays between the libraries they used so when installed
> > > > into the initramfs, the total size didn't go too big yet. But we can
> > > > see the size of systemd binary and libraries it used is much bigger
> > > > than others.
> > > 
> > > All systemd binaries will mostly link to the same libraries (because
> > > they link to a private shared library, which links to various other
> > > shared libraries). So this "20M" will be repeated over and over, but
> > > it's the same dependencies.
> > > 
> > > While we'd all prefer for this to be smaller, 20M should is actually
> > > not that much...
> > > 
> > > > And as a compare, from version 219 to 243, systemd's library
> > > > dependency increased a lot:
> > > > (v219 is 5M in total, v243 is 20M in total)
> > > 
> > > This is slightly misleading. Code was moved from individual binaries
> > > to libsystemd-shared-nnn.so, so if you look at the deps of just a single
> > > binary, you'll see many more deps (because libsystemd-shared-nnn.so has
> > > more deps). But the total number of deps when summed over all binaries
> > > grew much less. A more useful measure would be the size with deps summed
> > > over all systemd binaries that are installed into your image in v219 and
> > > v243.
> > > 
> > 
> > I vaguely remember the size increased before due to linking with libidn2
> > previously, so those libraries contribute a lot.
> > 
> > Does every systemd binary depend on all libraries? Or each of the
> > systemd binary only depends on those libs when really needed?
> 
> For example if I do not need journalctl, then I can drop journalctl and
> those libraries specific for journalctl?

It's using standard shared object linking, so yeah, for anything which
libsystemd-shared-nnn.so links to, "every systemd binary depend[s] on
all libraries", in the sense that the runtime linker will fail to start
the executable if any of the libraries are missing.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux