> With recent changes, such as [3], I am afraid that the day has come. It seems that the day came on Ruby 2.7.0, right? Ruby 2.7.0 includes the commit [3]. > Thoughts? > On the positive side, 1(2) would allow us to stay better in line with > "Pregenerated code" guidelines [5], because there is already quite a lot > of pre-generated code shipped in Ruby release tarball. For my first impression,, I agree with the way 1) and 2). > 2) Use previous version of Ruby available in Fedora to bootstrap Ruby. > But this does not work ATM, at least when RubyGems are installed. And > upstream is doing what they can to make RubyGems inseparable [4]. If we create the SRPM for "Use previous version of Ruby available in Fedora to bootstrap Ruby", which name do you like? The candidates: * rpms/ruby-bootstrap * rpms/bootstrap-ruby * rpms/previous-ruby -- Jun | He - His - Him _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
